I just wrote a pretty nice introduction. I don't know if I'll use it because I wrote it before I wrote any of the body of the essay, and it might read too much like a narrative. However, at the moment it makes a lot of sense to me and I'm glad because not much of anything else was making any sense. I like it enough to put it here just in case it doesn't make the final cut.
When
considering this essay choice, it was hard to clarify what ‘cultural background’
meant. I kept emphasising the word ‘cultural’
to myself, considering what culture
might mean. I don’t believe people are
ever a single culture. In my own life I have
always identified as a Pakeha/European, it seemed essential to who I am. Yet I moved to the USA to find that I am not that here. Here, I use my country descriptor, New Zealander or Kiwi.
Neither ‘Pakeha’ nor ‘European’ would make sense to an American.
It made me think: Well, what is a Pakeha? Why are
we European? I have heritage but I know the move from rural to urban in my early life
affected me in tangible ways while I'm unlikely to consider who my great-great-grandparents were. After some research, a definition was found which
satisfied my unease: “For each individual student the
intersection of social class, ethnicity, and gender can markedly influence
cultural practices, preferences, and prior experiences.” (Alton-Lee, 2003). I came to realise that the
word ‘background’ needed more emphasis.
It alludes to what has been, and what is but is not necessarily seen, to influences on a life. etc. etc.
Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality Teaching for
Diverse Students in Schooling: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES).
Wellington, N.Z.: Medium Term Strategy Policy Division, Ministry of Education.
No comments:
Post a Comment